Landscapes • Gerhard Richter

A review by Roderick Coyne

This book, devoted specifically to the landscape painting of Gerhard Richter is comprehensively illustrated and supported by three informative essays. The abstract painting and other projects of this multi-layered artist, are not treated directly, but serve as a context in which Richter’s career long concern for landscape, is explored. Richter’s puzzling statement “If the abstract paintings show my reality, then the landscapes and still lives show my yearning” is twice quoted in the text. As is suggested, yearning and nostalgia bear a strong family resemblance, albeit they stand  back to back.

At an exhibition of Richter’s photo-based work, the uncertain viewer will advance to the picture surface to try and establish just what he or she is looking at; a painting or a photograph? To the practised eye, close study will reveal evidence of the canvas surface and the texture of oil paint. (However with some of Richter’s works, the practised eye and certainly the unpractised eye, will still be left in some doubt). But with the reproductions in this book, no amount of close scrutiny of the page will be of any assistance, as of course the painted surface has now been translated to the photographic surface intrinsic to the technology of publishing. Publishing photographs of Richter’s paintings, which in turn were modelled on photographs, creates an unintentional paradox for the reader of this book.

The project that Richter set himself of painstakingly painting an image that as closely as possible resembles a photographic print, simultaneously questions the status of both what a painting is and what a photograph is. Our habitual response to a picture that looks like one of Richter’s landscape paintings is to automatically align it with our consumption of photographic imagery, rather than with our consumption of painting.

How radical a project is this? At face value such an enterprise would seem to be destined to result in a body of work, that no matter how skilfully executed, would be little more than a collection of banal photo-realist illustrations. However, there is a subversive element to Richter’s project, which lies partly in the nature of the photographs he uses as models. These tend to be his own snapshots, which embody some of the technical imperfections of much amateur photography; absence of depth gained through foreground framing, lack of depth of field and sharp focus, horizons that aren’t parallel and a crude and/or limited palette.

The resulting paintings achieve a compelling presence both through the aggrandisement of the snapshot by the increase in scale and through fidelity to the snapshot’s technical shortcomings. The subtle blurring of detail, deftly gives rise to a greater verisimilitude to the photographic original than it does to the scene that the photograph depicts. One cardinal distinction between a photograph and a painting depicting the same scene, is the fact that the photograph is incapable of selecting which features to include; it is by definition inclusive. Richter achieves some of his success in his painting by hinting at this inclusiveness, while simultaneously exercising the sort of control over his work that any painter would deploy. In an interview quoted in Dietmar Elgar’s essay in the book, Richter says “But I needed the greater objectivity of the photograph in order to correct my own way of seeing; for instance, if I draw an object from nature, I start to stylise and to change it in accordance with my personal vision and my training. But if I paint from a photograph, I can forget all the criteria that I get from these sources. I can paint against my will, as it were.” Later in his essay Elgar goes on to say that “Richter’s paintings work precisely because they transfer the fixed moment in the photograph into the timelessness of painting. The situation documented in the photographic original and bound to a topographical situation thus transcends the painting to become a placeless experience of Nature.”

As is made much of in the text, the Romantic tradition of Caspa David Friedrich haunts much of this work, but unlike Friedrich’s paintings, Richter’s painting depicts not an idealised transcendental landscape, but a landscape that the viewer feels he or she has either already experienced or could experience; nostalgia and yearning.

Gerhard Richter 
Landscapes
Edited by Dietmar Elger,
Texts by Hubertus Butin, Oskar Bätschmann, Dietmar Elger
Graphic design by Christoph Steinegger

English Text
2011. 176 pp., 82 color ills - 31.20 x 26.60 cm
 clothbound
ISBN 978-3-7757-2639-9

http://www.hatjecantz.de

East London Communities – a global race

The project looks at the history and relationship of the locality and the people located in and around an area sandwiched between the “City and Canary Wharf” – from the Pool of London to Victoria Docks; Whitechapel, Aldgate, Wapping, Shadwell, Limehouse, IoD….
By making a range of connections with the geographical area of East London, from the people who have come and gone, made their marks and gave their lives… the project ‘excavates’ memories, the fantasies, the contrived histories and the realities which elevate or blight our understanding.
The following words give reference and the intended direction and depth of the study (describing how the land lies – observing waves of people and transported goods passing through the area – identifying names with the topography to describe the dynamic).

Observation 1: on people
August – September 2012

What we see has been made by people who settled in the area or part of a shifting population. The River and waterways impacted on communities – brought people in, brought them together and divided them. There is a continual transformation of culture. The tidal movement of the water gave a rythm and temperament to how people live. Roads, houses, work shops, wharfs warehouses, factories, chapels, pubs, theatres, markets, stables, farms, orchards, farming plots describe shifting cultures and economies.

Observation 2: Geographical environment – resources
November – December 2012

Key natural topography covered with layers of history and “natural” disasters: Typhoid, black death, blitz, encroachment. Concreted marshlands, cliffs and hills hidden beneath towers and buildings (reversing shapes). Raw materials and goods from around the world shipped in, stored, manufactured, transformed, fermented, distributed.

Observation 3: Built environment – urban spread
February – March 2013

Economic shifts: from historical ‘blue collar’ import / export trading, and manufacturing to ‘white collar’ banking and financial services and the impact on the visual landscape: built environment and transport.

Some key words:
Locality
– (Community, specific geographical boundaries) Hill (Tower Hill) Cliff (Ratcliffe), Field…

Settlements – (Living specific accommodations) Estates, harbours, moors, docks, refuges, treasure houses, safekeeping, depositing, imprisonment…

Access – (Inward – Outward, connectivity) Aldgate, Broadgate, Bishopsgate, Highway, Lanes, Rivers, Harbours

Supply/Provision – (Raw materials, information, processing, output, communications [publish - broadcasting]) Water ways (Thames); River (Shad), Canals, wells / springs (Shadwell), Rope (Ropewalk Gardens), Cable (Street, Railway)

Manufacture – (River related, settlement related)…

Morris and Marx don’t rap like Eminem • “Pre-Raphaelites – Victorian Avant-Garde”

In the recently refurbished iconic St Pancras Station Hotel, Tate Britatin held a launch event for its forthcominge exhibition “Pre-Raphaelites – a Victorian Avant-Garde”. St Pancras was a fitting venue for the exhibition launch – emphasising the role of the railway in the Industrial revolution, the loss of ‘camelot’ to the urban spread of product hungry suburbs, and new mechanistic technologies which challenged traditional craft skills.

The exhibition, one of series of ‘major’ exhibitions during the “Olympic Year”, (following Hockney, Freud, Hirst….) that promote quintessentialy British artists and art movements, aims to “… juxtapose paintings with works in other media including the applied arts….”.

Although the decorative and the utilitarian outpourings of the ‘Brotherhood’ was intellectually grounded in co-operative socialism the Pre-Rraphaelite movement was also were universally popular. Components which were anathema to mid Victorian “academicians”. In this day and age -  where art and design practice have intermixed with each other it will be interesting to see whether the art of this ‘victorian avant garde’ will be viewed by today’s audiences as a (revolutionary) avant garde or as alien products from intergalactic luddites….

Tate Britain – Mill Bank London SW1 4RG, 12 September 2012 – 13 January 2013, 10am – 6pm Sat – Thurs, 10am – 10pm Fri.

“Iraq: how, where, for whom?” – Kennard-Phillips and Hanaa Malallah

The Mosaic Rooms 226 Cromwell Road SW5 0SW
19 April – 12 May 2012
Tues – Sat 11-6pm

See opening Video: http://youtu.be/UodHR5jyGeg

What is the role of War and what is achieved by re-presenting, overlayering and photographically generating imagery of acts of violence and aggression?

“Iraq: how, where, for whom?” generates a series of issues and questions about whether creating images of horror achieves anything, socially or politically, or whether images saturated with an artistic aesthetic – the act of arranging and placing (textures, colours, shapes) – risks overwhelming the intention. Here the aesthetic game play in ‘art’ to attract our gaze risks running counter to the unaesthetic ugliness of the subject matter.

Peter Kennard and Cat Phillips whose collaborative photomontage works rage against their country’s culture of perpetrating aggressive and illegal acts rest alongside Hanaa Malallah’s orchestrated debris from her country’s experience as a victim of these acts.
Peter Kennard has consistently produced a mass of iconic works which attack the criminal perpetrators of war. This empathetic combination from both sides has resulted in a weighty exhibition of works which should be seen.

 

Not for Vegetarians

Ann Gallagher and Chris Dercon

Chris Dercon, director of the ‘Tate Modern’ – an art power house which glances at St Pauls from across the south bank of the Thames – noted that during 2012 a trilogy of art exhibitions by David Hockney, Lucienne Freud and Damien Hirst provided London with a Cultural Olympics.

Comparisons are bound to be made. But who sets the criteria for the olympic arena? who is in the line up and who gets the gold medal?

Mirror mirror on the wall who is the greatest artist of them all….?

Old masters such as Lucienne Freud (b.1922 – recently died 2011) – David Hockney (b. 1937 – staring at the abyss) – and “yba” Damien Hirst (b. 1965…..) – is, like everything else, in the process of dying.

This holy trilogy of male painters are presented as three variants of “bad boys” of British Art…. Over a period of 80 years a common thread has been pulled through each one causing a tug of war between the intentions of the artist and the interests of the art market. All three have been sucked into the “commercial art” world – and painted on demand – though Hirst seems to have been sucked in the deepest. Most conversations with him refer to money rather than art – and his practice doesn’t seem to have divined wisdom.

Damien Hirst may like to consider that unlike the other two on the “olympian podium” his art is getting old and losing its value. This exhibition must be seen to its bitter and lurid end – but make sure you stand your ground and insist that entry is free!

David Hall “End Piece…1001 TV sets”

Switch Over

The global TV market represents around 1,220,000,000+ TV Households with at least one TV. The northern hemisphere continues to own the most TV sets per household unit. Russia, Europe and the US were the first TV populated regions between 1930s and 50s, followed in the next decade by Canada, South America, Australasia, China, Eastern Asia and finally Africa. TV is the global mechanism through which we are entertained and educated. It is a hugely powerful and popular medium which has embedded itself into our lives: often blamed for instigating the ills and faults of societies as much as their triumphs and achievements. It is impossible to imagine the world without TV and although we have the freedom to just switch it off we elect to turn it back on again day after day. In the half century or so since television broadcasting has been with us technological progress has occurred. The TVs of the 1930s were ‘mechanical’ systems of spinning discs reflecting synchronised electrical pulses providing ghostly transmissions. Analogue systems came with the development of more stable cathode-ray tubes whereby electrons agitate surfaces coated in phosphor to transmit signals. Analogue technology has been the established global technology throughout TV history – until very recently. With the evolution of digitisation, TV technology has converged with the “home computer”, cameras and telecommunications. The TV set is no longer the carrier of controlled set pieces – we can now scan across countries and time lines, interact with whatever when ever, actively feed into the technology as well extract from it. The quality of “picture” – colour, luminosity, dimensionality of digital is hyper-real compared to the grainy black and white images which our grandparents recall. But don’t be fooled – what we see and hear now is as “unreal”. The visual parallels to early photography and printing allowed analogue TV to be readily accepted as normal – It was only notation;  radio with pictures. The new sets on the block also offer illusions: but their chroma key back drops layered with digitised images shift our sense of reality even further. Conscious that the information we receive influences our actions the more real our “eye witnessing of the event” is the more impact it has upon us. Seeing is believing or is it? No longer can we be sure. The massed analogue TVs in David Hall’s commissioned installation “End Piece…1001 TV sets” describes the current log jam for broadcasting and illustrates the massive task of shifting old technology to make way for the new. The reclining TV monitors which fill the massive abandoned industrial gallery space absent mindedly broadcast ‘repeats’  – dealing us a game of snap which emphasises programme fodder out put – most of which we wouldn’t chose to consume anyway. The viewer is confronted with both the mental and physical heat of broadcasting, the visual cacophany of 1001 pensioned off analogue TVs doomed to “NFR”. The plug will soon be pulled on analogue to be replaced by freshfaced, broad shouldered, sharp and efficient digital who promises to liberate us from national programmed TV controllers, or controlled TV programmers… and an infinite hotel in an interactive global village will appear with more services, higher quality and faster broadcasting signals, speedier downloading/ uploading.

Hidden amidst the massed monitors of “End Piece…” is David Hall’s “Stooky Bill TV” (1990). “Stooky”, produced as an unscheduled TV Interruption piece first shown on C4, presents an imaginary conversation between John Logi Baird and a ventriloqist’s dummy. Also showing in two other rooms in P3s vast industrial engineered gallery space are two of David Hall’s earlier installations: “Progressive Recession” (1974) consisting of 9 x CCTV cameras and monitors that sequentially displaces the viewer and “TV Interruptions” (1971 and 2006) an installation of 7 x TV pieces. When analogue transmission is finally turned off in London (26 April) there will be four days to experience the “….terminal audio hiss and visual sea of white noise.” But where do these synthetic carcasses end up? maybe as props in a beautifully crafted TV documentary about small third world children picking them over for a living.

A before and after must see.

“End Piece…1001 TV Sets” David Hall solo exhibition: 16 March – 22 April 2012 Venue: Ambika P3 Galleries – University of Westminster, 35 Marylebone Road, London NW1 5LS AND Journal of Art & Art Education RCA Society Royal College of Art Society Exhibition opening photos

Art and Public Commissions

Artists have been commissioned to produce works of art for centuries. The route from the “Medicis” to the “Saatchis” describes the changing states of art – but it fundamentally follows the propaganda machine of “Church and State”.

Along the route artists have been either compliant or have quietly subverted the masters’ message. Art itself is a deceptive practice – ‘ce nest pas un pipe’ expressed the illusion and it was the artist, Magritte, who illustrated the practice. Today public art is a powerful expression of corporate taste. Decisions which determine what we see ‘in public’ are not necessarily arrived at through democratic process whether commissions are paid for through the public or the private purse. The Greater London Authority’s “Fourth Plinth” art commission project had a stab at bringing some democracy into the process but again the process is rooted into a very selective starting point and given criteria - a list of artists are invited to submit work from which ‘experts’ determine a winner. Given the very public world heritage site in which the ‘Fourth Plinth’ is located – Trafalgar Square – there is generous acceptance that the works exhibited should have some prestige as well as be of high quality. In some way this has perpetuated a culture of safe practice with safe artists ‘being asked’ to produce predictable works. Yet the “4th Plinth” project has challenged this precept and most of the works to date have not been disappointing.

The ‘Fourth Plinth’ itself is contentious. There are many established influential pressure groups who have plans for that space and arguments for maintaining traditional approaches. The intellectual tussle between the “conservative traditionalists” and the “progressives” is constantly overlaid with the suffocating regal spoiler about carbuncles and old friends.

Thankfully the future of the “4th plinth” appears to have been secured for the progressives with the conservatives yeilding to public pressure in support for the project. After the political regime change in the Greater London Authority, the body which “manages” Trafalgar Square, there were attempts to get rid of this contemporary upstart by gerrymandering tactics of putting yet another Military war hero on the plinth (Air Chief Marshal Sir Keith Park). A truce was called and the day was saved. With all it’s inherent faults the 4th Plinth project continues to provide a brilliantly generous opportunity for artists. It’s quality of thought is borne out of a socialist policy that insists on space for free cultural / artistic expression without fear. To counter the traditionalists argument – the contemporary “fourth plinth” gives itself up to display those very principles fought for by the stone faced warriors who surround the square – ‘freedom’ and ‘democracy’.

The plinth commission shows that artists can still confound those who are rigidly set as the arbiters of culture and controllers of ‘taste’: Antony Gormley introduced elements into the work which democratised the process by allotting the space on top of the plinth for an hour to anyone who wanted to be there –  exorcising the plinth from its pedestal past through 2400 people taking up his offer. Other artists have approached the space more traditionally but all with a twist – Yinka Shonibare placed a ship in a bottle, the ship being Nelson’s “Victory” but with sails of printed ‘African’ fabric – Marc Quinn located ‘Alison Lapper Pregnant’, a huge marble torso-bust of a naked disabled woman –  nordic artists Elmgreen & Dragset’s child’s nursery rocking horse made of bronze playfully challenges the militarist equestrian statues which rear up across London.

The ethos embedded in each of the works shown so far needs to enter into the process of how public art commissions are procured. Public art sails close to the “cultural fascism” of the Medicis and the Saatchis. Artists can manipulate the situation they find themselves in but the direction we go is determined by the position of feet and the first steps taken. In May this year there is an election for a Mayor of London and positions may change – who ever the mayor may be artists need to continue to protect their rights and achieve those rights we don’t yet have.

AND Is holding a series of ‘sunday discussions’ on artist rights (resale, exhibition, intellectual property and copy rights) as well as economics and welfare (percent for arts, placements, commissions).

 

May Ayres “Ceramic Pictures”

For a number of years May Ayres has transposed her skills as an illustrator to ceramics. At the same time both the strength and fragility of the high fired stoneware oxidation ceramics lends itself to the subject matter she has pursued – the human condition in extreme situations. Not natural conditions but cruel situations – ones manufactured by tyrants and oppressors: of war and peace-time torture. In the discourse of art equating to beauty May acknowledges that some of her works are ‘horrible’. They are not intended to be “liked” – they are about ‘horrible subjects’. Yet it is difficult not to ‘like’ these beautifully crafted works, their drawn and glazed surfaces struggle with the awkward anatomy of characters deformed by their corruption. She skillfully uses the leaden weight of the clay slumping in submission then fired up to challenge the cruel domination of the oppressor. Her book “Ceramic Pictures”, published by AND, is a visual documentation of the recent exhibition “God’s Wars”. The accompanying essay by Mick Perry, eloquently tells the stories which are hidden behind each piece. May’s work ‘Amal’ is showing in the “Peace-CON+flict” exhibition at AND eventSpace One.

May Ayres “God’s Wars” Ceramic Pictures (2005-2011)
Copyright • May Ayres © 2011 • London
First published in Great Britain 2011
ISBN 978-0-9533977-1-6

Published by AND Association: w: www.and.org.uk
w: www.mayayres.com

Design and print production by ArtZone Co-op Ltd: www.artzone.coop

A ‘taster’ of this publication can be viewed here may-ayres-ceramicpictures

Cable Street Mural – a continuing story – 30 years in the making

The re-innauguration of the renovated “Cable Street Mural” which adorns the side wall of St George’s Town Hall provided a focus for a celebration of people’s victory against adversity. The mural – a now world famous visual depiction of the ‘battle’ which raged in London’s east end in the 1936  – is also a story of a number of artists coming together to research, design and carry out a task that was both creatively and physically challenging. The magic that permeates around the mural is from the myriad of stories that circulate it – from local people who were directly involved in the ‘Battle’ to the artists who imagined the scene and the politicians who enabled the mural to come into being. Each element giving extra dimension to our experience and understanding. The idea to paint a large mural depicting an event of local social and political significance is one story, another story is the artists’ physical task of carrying out the work, local groups and individuals who joined in the campaign to have the mural and secure its location have another story. The events  illustrated in the mural bring together diverse collective memories of October 4th 1936 – the actual day the ‘battle’ against Mosley’s fascist march into the east end of London took place.

The arduous and physical process of locating, designing, and making the Cable Street mural is significant in the development of community led initiatives. Disputes of ‘ownership’, stylistic approaches and technical methods, and questions over ‘subject matter’ has opened up the whole issue of what is public and what is community, what is engagement. In the late 1970s there was a movement to paint murals in public spaces. The movement was most evident in Ireland during the “troubles” with a blossoming of massive illustrative murals on the sides of broken down buildings. However these murals were sectarian and seen as confrontational – At the same time NY punk hip hop graffiti was on the rise with murals perceived as grafitti and considered anti-social – running alongside these conflicting practices artists in residence were actively encouraging children to decorate their drab urban environments with paint and mosaics – this was seen as positive action which brought communities together and gave them a sense of place.

The artist who initiated the Cable Street mural project in 1979 was Dave Binnington. He contacted fellow painter Paul Butler and following discussions and a pooling of visual ideas an image for a mural emerged. Local people were  also ‘thinking’ of murals as a way to engage with the wider community. The ‘political’ subject matter of the mural was bound to attract adversaries. In the early stages of the Binnington /Butler mural production when the images were becoming apparent it was attacked by the BNP. This attack coupled with technical and physical difficulties that had built up around the mural resulted in Dave Binnington’s abandoning the project. Following this Paul Butler took up the task and contacted another muralist, Des Rochfort – who in turn pulled in Ray Walker. The three artists then set to work redesigning the mural whilst maintaining elements of Binnington’s initial proposal. The work was sectioned up and apportioned out to the three artists who working three or four day weeks took a year to complete the painting. It was not an easy task physically and the occasional attacks from passing members of the BNP impacted on the emotional well being of the artists. The mural was finally completed in 1983. Ten years later, in 1994, the mural was seriously ‘paint bombed’ by the BNP – during the political turmoil of the 1980s and early 90s there had been a rise of (NF) BNP activities. in 1993 Tower Hamlets (Millwall) saw the first election of a BNP councillor, Derek Beacon. The extensive ‘vandalism’ against the mural, waged by the BNPs ‘Combat 18′, caused the artists to  think about protection – the type of paint – their own safety – costs – insurance – liability and legalities. Other issues that rose to the surface were moral and intellectual rights.

Although care and research was made about the materials and paint processes (Keim paint – v – synthetic paint) the mural began to suffer from weathering. Structural problems and the rendering of the exterior walls of the Old Town Hall also had to be resolved.

By the 70th anniversary of the Battle of Cable Street substantial parts of the mural were in jeopardy. Colours were fading and sections of painted surfaces were flaking – graphic details were slowly being lost forever. What had become a world famous mural was beginning to look very shabby. The mural was universally ladnired both for its subject matter and for it’s strong ‘Riveira’esque style’. Local people called for its refurbishment. Eventually, “section 106″ money (a method of apportioning funds from building and infrastructure developments) was found by the council and allocated for the mural’s refurbishment. But there was more delay and the community feared the mural would become beyond repair. New energy as a result of a change in ‘political leadership in the local authority saw the newly elected Mayor take up the cause to save the mural. The renovation was undertaken by one of the originating artists, Paul Butler, and his team  and got underway during the summer of 2011. It was completed in time for the celebration of the 75th Anniversary of the ‘Battle of Cable Street.

‘As an artist, and as a man of the left, I am very proud of my role in painting the mural. I do not claim ownership of it. It was clearly a collaborative piece of work. But I am honoured to have been part of this huge creative project and to have worked with Ray Walker and Desmond Rochfort. We put a year of our lives into the painting of it, apart from repairing it. It cost us dear – and nearly cost me my life. I believe this gives me the right to do – or supervise – any repainting that needs to be done, and I would remind you that artist’s ‘Moral rights’ are now enshrined in law.’ Paul Butler *

AND took an active role campaigning to save the mural and intervened to help ensure the originating artists were directly involved in the renovation works. AND also actively lobbied for a local community-led programme of events to take place to commemorate the 75th anniversary of the Battle of Cable Street. Family ‘fun’ events took place over the long weekend at the beginning of October with a special event on the actual date of the ‘Battle’ – 4 October.

The Mural continues to draw visitors from far and wide and once again vividly recalls  historically important human events that should never fade away.

Publications refs:

  • ‘Ray Walker’ published by the Ray Walker Memorial Committee 1985 – Sponsored by the GLC and LBTH
  • ‘History of Cable Street Mural’ Paul Butler

Peace + CON-flict – (Come and See II)

Artists are invited to bring works to AND eventSpace 1 in line with the theme of “Peace + CON-flict”.

During the month long event issues will be raised and discussed with who ever is present in the ‘eventSpace’ at the time. The contributed works will be located in the space for a length of time agreed between AND Association and the artist. Notions and understanding of the theme “Peace + CON-flict” will evolve as the event continues. What happens in the space may be recorded, works may change, come and go, get replaced. Nothing is fixed. The event will cause impact.

This is a positive and constructive event. “Peace + CON-flict” (Come and See II) offers space, a place to locate, sit and consider. Artists contributions are entirely voluntary. If you are an artist and want to take part in “Peace + CON-flict” whether offering an art work, a conversation, a statement – please contact AND.

Basra Highway © Susan Stein 1991