Crossing Fields – Roderick Coyne

The title of the exhibition “Crossing Fields” plays on an ability to see – between a “field of view” – the cross over between painting to photography and back again – and how the illusion of seeing is transferred to each other through perfecting techniques that visually register that which we see.

Roderick Coyne - Selvedge 2013

Roderick Coyne’s exhibition of recent works fills the gallery space with a mood of British nautical experience from the subjects he selects to observe: a WWI listening post, an abandoned rowing boat, a rusted iron curtain, shoreline xblocs, The works also explore how a multi-dimensional image comes into being on a flat surface and grapple with the “apothecary” process of photography and the emergence of digitised imagery. Added to this is Coyne’s continuing interest in the tricky skill of illusory reality of physical gestural painting and the instant capture of reality at a click of the camera.

Look deep into the works shown in ‘Crossing Fields’ and you will see alternating sections of images flowing into printed photographs placed alongside the flat application of pigment in areas of abstracted shapes reminiscent of the pointillist technique that evolved in the 19th Century: a style of painting perfected by George Seurat, Paul Signac, van Gogh, who, coincidentally, practiced at a time when there was growing scientific interest in the deconstruction of the material into sub atomic particles.

Crossing Fields also brings to mind artists historical employment of ‘photographic’ or projection techniques to assist them paint larger than life images. The gradual progression from camera obscura and pinhole cameras to Louis Daguerre’s photographic process on silvered copper plate eventually caused the ‘hyperrealist heroic’ painter Delaroche to declare in 1839 that “…from today painting is dead.” Although this statement jettisoned traditional painted realism shackled by the requirement for “realistic representation” to history it ushered in a liberated and more progressive painting practice. But this old cuckoo continues to disturb…

(reviewed by Jenni Boswell-Jones)

Crossing Fields – an exhibition of recent work – Roderick Coyne – 18 May – 2 June 2013 – AND “eventSpace 1”. See images from exhibition opening.

Also read Susan Trangmar’s introductory text for exhibition catalogue

Not for Vegetarians

Ann Gallagher and Chris Dercon

Chris Dercon, director of the ‘Tate Modern’ – an art power house which glances at St Pauls from across the south bank of the Thames – noted that during 2012 a trilogy of art exhibitions by David Hockney, Lucienne Freud and Damien Hirst provided London with a Cultural Olympics.

Comparisons are bound to be made. But who sets the criteria for the olympic arena? who is in the line up and who gets the gold medal?

Mirror mirror on the wall who is the greatest artist of them all….?

Old masters such as Lucienne Freud (b.1922 – recently died 2011) – David Hockney (b. 1937 – staring at the abyss) – and “yba” Damien Hirst (b. 1965…..) – is, like everything else, in the process of dying.

This holy trilogy of male painters are presented as three variants of “bad boys” of British Art…. Over a period of 80 years a common thread has been pulled through each one causing a tug of war between the intentions of the artist and the interests of the art market. All three have been sucked into the “commercial art” world – and painted on demand – though Hirst seems to have been sucked in the deepest. Most conversations with him refer to money rather than art – and his practice doesn’t seem to have divined wisdom.

Damien Hirst may like to consider that unlike the other two on the “olympian podium” his art is getting old and losing its value. This exhibition must be seen to its bitter and lurid end – but make sure you stand your ground and insist that entry is free!

David Hall “End Piece…1001 TV sets”

Switch Over

The global TV market represents around 1,220,000,000+ TV Households with at least one TV. The northern hemisphere continues to own the most TV sets per household unit. Russia, Europe and the US were the first TV populated regions between 1930s and 50s, followed in the next decade by Canada, South America, Australasia, China, Eastern Asia and finally Africa. TV is the global mechanism through which we are entertained and educated. It is a hugely powerful and popular medium which has embedded itself into our lives: often blamed for instigating the ills and faults of societies as much as their triumphs and achievements. It is impossible to imagine the world without TV and although we have the freedom to just switch it off we elect to turn it back on again day after day. In the half century or so since television broadcasting has been with us technological progress has occurred. The TVs of the 1930s were ‘mechanical’ systems of spinning discs reflecting synchronised electrical pulses providing ghostly transmissions. Analogue systems came with the development of more stable cathode-ray tubes whereby electrons agitate surfaces coated in phosphor to transmit signals. Analogue technology has been the established global technology throughout TV history – until very recently. With the evolution of digitisation, TV technology has converged with the “home computer”, cameras and telecommunications. The TV set is no longer the carrier of controlled set pieces – we can now scan across countries and time lines, interact with whatever when ever, actively feed into the technology as well extract from it. The quality of “picture” – colour, luminosity, dimensionality of digital is hyper-real compared to the grainy black and white images which our grandparents recall. But don’t be fooled – what we see and hear now is as “unreal”. The visual parallels to early photography and printing allowed analogue TV to be readily accepted as normal – It was only notation;  radio with pictures. The new sets on the block also offer illusions: but their chroma key back drops layered with digitised images shift our sense of reality even further. Conscious that the information we receive influences our actions the more real our “eye witnessing of the event” is the more impact it has upon us. Seeing is believing or is it? No longer can we be sure. The massed analogue TVs in David Hall’s commissioned installation “End Piece…1001 TV sets” describes the current log jam for broadcasting and illustrates the massive task of shifting old technology to make way for the new. The reclining TV monitors which fill the massive abandoned industrial gallery space absent mindedly broadcast ‘repeats’  – dealing us a game of snap which emphasises programme fodder out put – most of which we wouldn’t chose to consume anyway. The viewer is confronted with both the mental and physical heat of broadcasting, the visual cacophany of 1001 pensioned off analogue TVs doomed to “NFR”. The plug will soon be pulled on analogue to be replaced by freshfaced, broad shouldered, sharp and efficient digital who promises to liberate us from national programmed TV controllers, or controlled TV programmers… and an infinite hotel in an interactive global village will appear with more services, higher quality and faster broadcasting signals, speedier downloading/ uploading.

Hidden amidst the massed monitors of “End Piece…” is David Hall’s “Stooky Bill TV” (1990). “Stooky”, produced as an unscheduled TV Interruption piece first shown on C4, presents an imaginary conversation between John Logi Baird and a ventriloqist’s dummy. Also showing in two other rooms in P3s vast industrial engineered gallery space are two of David Hall’s earlier installations: “Progressive Recession” (1974) consisting of 9 x CCTV cameras and monitors that sequentially displaces the viewer and “TV Interruptions” (1971 and 2006) an installation of 7 x TV pieces. When analogue transmission is finally turned off in London (26 April) there will be four days to experience the “….terminal audio hiss and visual sea of white noise.” But where do these synthetic carcasses end up? maybe as props in a beautifully crafted TV documentary about small third world children picking them over for a living.

A before and after must see.

“End Piece…1001 TV Sets” David Hall solo exhibition: 16 March – 22 April 2012 Venue: Ambika P3 Galleries – University of Westminster, 35 Marylebone Road, London NW1 5LS AND Journal of Art & Art Education RCA Society Royal College of Art Society Exhibition opening photos

Art and Public Commissions

Artists have been commissioned to produce works of art for centuries. The route from the “Medicis” to the “Saatchis” describes the changing states of art – but it fundamentally follows the propaganda machine of “Church and State”.

Along the route artists have been either compliant or have quietly subverted the masters’ message. Art itself is a deceptive practice – ‘ce nest pas un pipe’ expressed the illusion and it was the artist, Magritte, who illustrated the practice. Today public art is a powerful expression of corporate taste. Decisions which determine what we see ‘in public’ are not necessarily arrived at through democratic process whether commissions are paid for through the public or the private purse. The Greater London Authority’s “Fourth Plinth” art commission project had a stab at bringing some democracy into the process but again the process is rooted into a very selective starting point and given criteria - a list of artists are invited to submit work from which ‘experts’ determine a winner. Given the very public world heritage site in which the ‘Fourth Plinth’ is located – Trafalgar Square – there is generous acceptance that the works exhibited should have some prestige as well as be of high quality. In some way this has perpetuated a culture of safe practice with safe artists ‘being asked’ to produce predictable works. Yet the “4th Plinth” project has challenged this precept and most of the works to date have not been disappointing.

The ‘Fourth Plinth’ itself is contentious. There are many established influential pressure groups who have plans for that space and arguments for maintaining traditional approaches. The intellectual tussle between the “conservative traditionalists” and the “progressives” is constantly overlaid with the suffocating regal spoiler about carbuncles and old friends.

Thankfully the future of the “4th plinth” appears to have been secured for the progressives with the conservatives yeilding to public pressure in support for the project. After the political regime change in the Greater London Authority, the body which “manages” Trafalgar Square, there were attempts to get rid of this contemporary upstart by gerrymandering tactics of putting yet another Military war hero on the plinth (Air Chief Marshal Sir Keith Park). A truce was called and the day was saved. With all it’s inherent faults the 4th Plinth project continues to provide a brilliantly generous opportunity for artists. It’s quality of thought is borne out of a socialist policy that insists on space for free cultural / artistic expression without fear. To counter the traditionalists argument – the contemporary “fourth plinth” gives itself up to display those very principles fought for by the stone faced warriors who surround the square – ‘freedom’ and ‘democracy’.

The plinth commission shows that artists can still confound those who are rigidly set as the arbiters of culture and controllers of ‘taste’: Antony Gormley introduced elements into the work which democratised the process by allotting the space on top of the plinth for an hour to anyone who wanted to be there –  exorcising the plinth from its pedestal past through 2400 people taking up his offer. Other artists have approached the space more traditionally but all with a twist – Yinka Shonibare placed a ship in a bottle, the ship being Nelson’s “Victory” but with sails of printed ‘African’ fabric – Marc Quinn located ‘Alison Lapper Pregnant’, a huge marble torso-bust of a naked disabled woman –  nordic artists Elmgreen & Dragset’s child’s nursery rocking horse made of bronze playfully challenges the militarist equestrian statues which rear up across London.

The ethos embedded in each of the works shown so far needs to enter into the process of how public art commissions are procured. Public art sails close to the “cultural fascism” of the Medicis and the Saatchis. Artists can manipulate the situation they find themselves in but the direction we go is determined by the position of feet and the first steps taken. In May this year there is an election for a Mayor of London and positions may change – who ever the mayor may be artists need to continue to protect their rights and achieve those rights we don’t yet have.

AND Is holding a series of ‘sunday discussions’ on artist rights (resale, exhibition, intellectual property and copy rights) as well as economics and welfare (percent for arts, placements, commissions).

 

May Ayres “Ceramic Pictures”

For a number of years May Ayres has transposed her skills as an illustrator to ceramics. At the same time both the strength and fragility of the high fired stoneware oxidation ceramics lends itself to the subject matter she has pursued – the human condition in extreme situations. Not natural conditions but cruel situations – ones manufactured by tyrants and oppressors: of war and peace-time torture. In the discourse of art equating to beauty May acknowledges that some of her works are ‘horrible’. They are not intended to be “liked” – they are about ‘horrible subjects’. Yet it is difficult not to ‘like’ these beautifully crafted works, their drawn and glazed surfaces struggle with the awkward anatomy of characters deformed by their corruption. She skillfully uses the leaden weight of the clay slumping in submission then fired up to challenge the cruel domination of the oppressor. Her book “Ceramic Pictures”, published by AND, is a visual documentation of the recent exhibition “God’s Wars”. The accompanying essay by Mick Perry, eloquently tells the stories which are hidden behind each piece. May’s work ‘Amal’ is showing in the “Peace-CON+flict” exhibition at AND eventSpace One.

May Ayres “God’s Wars” Ceramic Pictures (2005-2011)
Copyright • May Ayres © 2011 • London
First published in Great Britain 2011
ISBN 978-0-9533977-1-6

Published by AND Association: w: www.and.org.uk
w: www.mayayres.com

Design and print production by ArtZone Co-op Ltd: www.artzone.coop

A ‘taster’ of this publication can be viewed here may-ayres-ceramicpictures

Cable Street Mural – a continuing story – 30 years in the making

The re-innauguration of the renovated “Cable Street Mural” which adorns the side wall of St George’s Town Hall provided a focus for a celebration of people’s victory against adversity. The mural – a now world famous visual depiction of the ‘battle’ which raged in London’s east end in the 1936  – is also a story of a number of artists coming together to research, design and carry out a task that was both creatively and physically challenging. The magic that permeates around the mural is from the myriad of stories that circulate it – from local people who were directly involved in the ‘Battle’ to the artists who imagined the scene and the politicians who enabled the mural to come into being. Each element giving extra dimension to our experience and understanding. The idea to paint a large mural depicting an event of local social and political significance is one story, another story is the artists’ physical task of carrying out the work, local groups and individuals who joined in the campaign to have the mural and secure its location have another story. The events  illustrated in the mural bring together diverse collective memories of October 4th 1936 – the actual day the ‘battle’ against Mosley’s fascist march into the east end of London took place.

The arduous and physical process of locating, designing, and making the Cable Street mural is significant in the development of community led initiatives. Disputes of ‘ownership’, stylistic approaches and technical methods, and questions over ‘subject matter’ has opened up the whole issue of what is public and what is community, what is engagement. In the late 1970s there was a movement to paint murals in public spaces. The movement was most evident in Ireland during the “troubles” with a blossoming of massive illustrative murals on the sides of broken down buildings. However these murals were sectarian and seen as confrontational – At the same time NY punk hip hop graffiti was on the rise with murals perceived as grafitti and considered anti-social – running alongside these conflicting practices artists in residence were actively encouraging children to decorate their drab urban environments with paint and mosaics – this was seen as positive action which brought communities together and gave them a sense of place.

The artist who initiated the Cable Street mural project in 1979 was Dave Binnington. He contacted fellow painter Paul Butler and following discussions and a pooling of visual ideas an image for a mural emerged. Local people were  also ‘thinking’ of murals as a way to engage with the wider community. The ‘political’ subject matter of the mural was bound to attract adversaries. In the early stages of the Binnington /Butler mural production when the images were becoming apparent it was attacked by the BNP. This attack coupled with technical and physical difficulties that had built up around the mural resulted in Dave Binnington’s abandoning the project. Following this Paul Butler took up the task and contacted another muralist, Des Rochfort – who in turn pulled in Ray Walker. The three artists then set to work redesigning the mural whilst maintaining elements of Binnington’s initial proposal. The work was sectioned up and apportioned out to the three artists who working three or four day weeks took a year to complete the painting. It was not an easy task physically and the occasional attacks from passing members of the BNP impacted on the emotional well being of the artists. The mural was finally completed in 1983. Ten years later, in 1994, the mural was seriously ‘paint bombed’ by the BNP – during the political turmoil of the 1980s and early 90s there had been a rise of (NF) BNP activities. in 1993 Tower Hamlets (Millwall) saw the first election of a BNP councillor, Derek Beacon. The extensive ‘vandalism’ against the mural, waged by the BNPs ‘Combat 18′, caused the artists to  think about protection – the type of paint – their own safety – costs – insurance – liability and legalities. Other issues that rose to the surface were moral and intellectual rights.

Although care and research was made about the materials and paint processes (Keim paint – v – synthetic paint) the mural began to suffer from weathering. Structural problems and the rendering of the exterior walls of the Old Town Hall also had to be resolved.

By the 70th anniversary of the Battle of Cable Street substantial parts of the mural were in jeopardy. Colours were fading and sections of painted surfaces were flaking – graphic details were slowly being lost forever. What had become a world famous mural was beginning to look very shabby. The mural was universally ladnired both for its subject matter and for it’s strong ‘Riveira’esque style’. Local people called for its refurbishment. Eventually, “section 106″ money (a method of apportioning funds from building and infrastructure developments) was found by the council and allocated for the mural’s refurbishment. But there was more delay and the community feared the mural would become beyond repair. New energy as a result of a change in ‘political leadership in the local authority saw the newly elected Mayor take up the cause to save the mural. The renovation was undertaken by one of the originating artists, Paul Butler, and his team  and got underway during the summer of 2011. It was completed in time for the celebration of the 75th Anniversary of the ‘Battle of Cable Street.

‘As an artist, and as a man of the left, I am very proud of my role in painting the mural. I do not claim ownership of it. It was clearly a collaborative piece of work. But I am honoured to have been part of this huge creative project and to have worked with Ray Walker and Desmond Rochfort. We put a year of our lives into the painting of it, apart from repairing it. It cost us dear – and nearly cost me my life. I believe this gives me the right to do – or supervise – any repainting that needs to be done, and I would remind you that artist’s ‘Moral rights’ are now enshrined in law.’ Paul Butler *

AND took an active role campaigning to save the mural and intervened to help ensure the originating artists were directly involved in the renovation works. AND also actively lobbied for a local community-led programme of events to take place to commemorate the 75th anniversary of the Battle of Cable Street. Family ‘fun’ events took place over the long weekend at the beginning of October with a special event on the actual date of the ‘Battle’ – 4 October.

The Mural continues to draw visitors from far and wide and once again vividly recalls  historically important human events that should never fade away.

Publications refs:

  • ‘Ray Walker’ published by the Ray Walker Memorial Committee 1985 – Sponsored by the GLC and LBTH
  • ‘History of Cable Street Mural’ Paul Butler

Peace + CON-flict – (Come and See II)

Artists are invited to bring works to AND eventSpace 1 in line with the theme of “Peace + CON-flict”.

During the month long event issues will be raised and discussed with who ever is present in the ‘eventSpace’ at the time. The contributed works will be located in the space for a length of time agreed between AND Association and the artist. Notions and understanding of the theme “Peace + CON-flict” will evolve as the event continues. What happens in the space may be recorded, works may change, come and go, get replaced. Nothing is fixed. The event will cause impact.

This is a positive and constructive event. “Peace + CON-flict” (Come and See II) offers space, a place to locate, sit and consider. Artists contributions are entirely voluntary. If you are an artist and want to take part in “Peace + CON-flict” whether offering an art work, a conversation, a statement – please contact AND.

Basra Highway © Susan Stein 1991